Cursor vs Replit

Security comparison for AI-powered development platforms

Cursor

AI-powered code editor

medium risk
Safer Choice
🔄

Replit

Online IDE with AI code generation

medium risk

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCursorReplit
Risk LevelMEDIUMMEDIUM
Critical Vulnerabilities20
High Vulnerabilities13
Total Vulnerabilities55
Checklist Items1010
Required Fixes65
Categoryai editorai builder

Key Vulnerabilities

Cursor

Unsafe eval() or dynamic code execution
SQL injection via string concatenation
Missing authentication checks on API routes

Replit

Secrets visible in Replit environment
Missing authentication on generated APIs
Hardcoded database connection strings

Cursor is the safer option, but both need a security review

No AI platform is secure by default. Erzo scans your app regardless of which tool you used.

    Erzo — AI Code Security Scanner | Error Zero